heya Danial,yup me concur, a bravery act so me put as a unprecedented assault, but then nobody blog bout him getting award frm Libya just yet.

@Inah, yup I knoe and have no doubt bout it ;)

Dear Mamasita,

I would varies about calling him a stupido and would never regard such action as rude, knowing whom he's engage wth of course.
Knowing Bush and the crusader that he did on Iraq, the destruction that he cost, the untold misery and much more unknow to disaster never make know to the world, I think his action is justify.What else should a true Iraqi felt when his nation been bombard close to ruin?What else should they felt when blood splas every where,when a tarmac and coffeshop fill with blood stain, Do you know how does it felt to be outside, on a road side or marketplace, goverment's office or even at police stations is no exception, knowing fully tht somehow you happen to be at the wrong place at the wrong time?
This fear is never unfounded nor it was isolated...day by day....the gun shots the bom exploded..The scar is real! The never ending hardship inspike of oil rich country is matter of facts. When the Iraq oil been siphoened in the pretect of oil for food scheme, people's like Al Zaidi look in disgust but helpess nevertheless. And he's not alone. Many Iraqi not blind for sure. Even our PM stain wth it in one way or another.When the invader brought back Hamid Karzai and subsequently made this former CIA runner as a president of the Iraq what else should this people do? Go into the street and protesting? or should they burn the US or Britt flag?unlikely..
When US marin using cluster bom then inflate heavy damage in the span a few kilometer of the target impact, more often than not hit the civilian due to poor inteligence information or inacuracy of a beta or even alfa (still under development) type of weapon or tboth factors combine. what can he do otrs than sheed tears (and growing hate) when the bunker buster drill into the civilian bunker tht shelter hundreed of children from the air raids, which later exploded and left the human skin and flesh burn alive on the wall that left a visible marks and shade to this very day.

If you think this is really bad, but I assured you it aint that bad still! The worse is yet to be reveal. Since the first Gulf war in 1991, A lot of experimental type of weaponery has find it ways in the battle ground.Among others is a few type of weaponry coated with Depleted Uranium (DU) has been used against Iraqi for the first time in the history of human kind. A clear indication that Iraq beem a testing ground as I assert earlier, for diferent type of future weapon. Until second Gulf war the ammunition and bombs loaded wth DU was enourmous. For those who's are not from science background, i'll try walk you a bit and hope to shead some light somehow. Uranium is a radioactive material, compare with plutonioun grade nuclear fuel, Uranium is quick weak. It mean it produced less radioative or emitting less ionizing radation to be exact. All radioactive material decay and their mass (the quantity of matter which body contain) will be depleted over time and emittting radioactive at the same time. Uranium toke up to 4.5 billion years to completly decay meaning this radioactive in Iraq would remain the over the same span of 4.5 billion years. I repeat, it 4.5 billion year my friends not 45 years.Uranium has special charactaristic among the elements in the world, its the heaviest elements know to human and its damn cheap. Dirty cheap would suit it better 'caurse its a waste product. This waste is from used fuel of nuclear power plan or sub marine nuclear reactor as well as from the atomic bomb productions. DU make the amunition shell extremly hard that it could punch into tanks or reinforced bunkers easly. Anything else would be as kacang while spontaneously produced fire while doing that surely would fry people in a matter of a minutest. Enough wth the lesson, now the real danger.I think you have read elsewere about radioactive, therefore will not go detail on this.

BTW, millions of radioactive uranium oxide particles released after it explode not only kill people at relatily close distance but it also easy-peasy,lightweight , extremly small and extremly lethal. It can easly blow away by the wind or cary by desert storm and travel a thousand miles. Do you know that storms from the Sahara Desert carry dust and microorganisms across the Atlantic Ocean to Florida and into the Gulf of Mexico? What about Iraqi storm?Isolated?very unlikely! It's not only worse but severely horrible to deal with.This particles is so tiny that coud find it way into the gas mask! so you tell me how one could protect themself? So what does it mean?
It mean over many many centuries it will instigate cancer, leukemia,kidney failure, brain damage and extreme birth defects, mutate the gents will ultimately guarantee killing millions of people for centuries to come. The effect alredy begun to emerge, where the birth rate decline significantly in Iraq, and for those whose survived, the irst thing parents would ask: its normal?The question, over the year become so comon, so does the reply.

The Pentagon could deny as it may, just like when they deny the facts and madeup the case to invaded Iraq or how they deny using Agent Orange in Vietnam not so long ago,resulting million of US soldiers who served in the Vietnam War have contracted cancer and serious health problem. The US military sprayed approximately million gallons of Agent Orange over nearly large area of Vietnamese territory for more than eight years. Unfortunately this is worse than 'nan.

So when the ugly lie go to sleep, the naked truth will wake up and show it face. yeah truth alway prevail as many people will say, Back home a lot of servicemen and woman who enggage wth DU type of amunitions has noticed their health dropped gradually. Over the years those very strong US Marin, Navy seal, Infantry battalion become a bit week and alway fall sick. Those pround man and woman of among the toughes training and physical endurance suddently found them self a frequent visit to clinic and drug store. A testament of serious illness nevertheless. They always diagnosed as "unknow illness". Althought their exposure to the DU is relaticfly short conpare to the Iraqi people who had no choice but to life their life in the contaminat land, yet they have another thing that make a matter worse for then, as part of the military assault, in th pretext of fear of Sadam (un)existing WMD, the soldier are requaired to take vaccination which is so unfortunely has yet to completed it clinical test.

So ma'am,
You tell me how do I comprehand this? Yepp I agree he may have a family, extended family,a friends, a co-worker, a buddy, or even a baby...try relate all those story that I post previously..and if tht is not surfice enough still, me can assure you all those ablebodied and sound mind in Iraq could tell you many better stories,not a bed times stories, not for a faint heart also.

There's more, and more I gonna feed you or anyone else who care to listen.So listen you should. Do you know that there is romor monger goes wild in intelligence community circa about the credibility of the US inteligence information that justify the attack on Iraq since as early as 2002?The New York Times article publish in July, 2003 by, Joseph C. Wilson confirm and clearly refute the clain about iraqi's Niger yellow cake uranioum connection. This is the man who's has been task by CIA to to verify the early report on Iraq.

Read this:
[A Pentagon top secrect transcript of the 10-minute discussion between Straw and Powell at the Waldorf Hotel clearly shows both expressed concerns that intelligence reports were mainly assumptions and assessments not supported by hard facts or other sources. Powell come away from briefings by the Pentagon's office of special plans, set up by Mr Wolfowitz, "apprehensive" about what he called, at best, circumstantial evidence tilted in favour of assessments drawn from the office itself, rather than actual raw intelligence.
Powell at one point labeled the information "bullshit" and balked at presenting the so-called "evidence" to the UN Security Council. Mr Powell told the British Foreign Secretary he hoped the facts, when they came out, would not "explode in their faces". The "Waldorf transcripts" are being circulated within NATO and had been leaked by diplomats who had supported the war against Iraq, but now believe they had been lied to.

Deputy US Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz admitted in a magazine article that "for bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one . . . everyone could agree on" to publicly justify the war

Declassified Pentagon documents demonstrate that the CIA white paper was modified in ways that conformed to the desires of the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy and his office, in much the same way that British documents indicate that country’s white paper was changed to conform to the desires of the Blair government.]

Here is the lates one and came from the man himself.
August 22, 2006
President Bush Admits Iraq Had No WMDs and ‘Nothing’ to Do With 9/11
AMY GOODMAN: On Monday, Present Bush admitted the Iraq war is “straining the psyche of our country,” but he vowed to stay the course. A reporter questioned him about why he opposed withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq.

REPORTER: A lot of the consequences you mentioned for pulling out seem like maybe they never would have been there if we hadn’t gone in. How do you square all of that?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: I square it, because—imagine a world in which you had Saddam Hussein who had the capacity to make a weapon of mass destruction, who was paying suiciders to kill innocent life, who would—who had relations with Zarqawi. Imagine what the world would be like with him in power. The idea is to try to help change the Middle East.

Now, look, I didn’t—part of the reason we went into Iraq was—the main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn’t, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction. But I also talked about the human suffering in Iraq, and I also talked the need to advance a freedom agenda. And so my question—my answer to your question is, is that—imagine a world in which Saddam Hussein was there, stirring up even more trouble in a part of the world that had so much resentment and so much hatred that people came and killed 3,000 of our citizens.

You know, I’ve heard this theory about, you know, everything was just fine until we arrived, and then, you know, kind of that we’re going to stir up the hornet’s nest theory. It just—just doesn’t hold water, as far as I’m concerned. The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East.

REPORTER: What did Iraq have to do with that?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: What did Iraq have to do with what?

REPORTER: The attack on the World Trade Center?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Nothing, except for it’s part of—and nobody has ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a—Iraq—the lesson of September the 11th is, take threats before they fully materialize, Ken. Nobody has ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq.

AMY GOODMAN: President Bush at his news conference yesterda

@emo
Bisa anja loe comment pake bahasa Indonesia,I will speed up my mind a bit...hahaha

@mercuryfalling
He definetly has a gutts. I dont want to be pedantic ere, as me already wrote so much above,so you should get my points by now.